Skip to content
AGENTIC15 Docs

Token-Efficient Prompts: Get Better Results, Use Less AI

Reduce AI usage by 40% while getting BETTER results. Write token-efficient prompts that save money and improve responses.

Reading time: 5 minutes Category: Workflow & Productivity Published: January 11, 2026

The Token Problem

What most developers do:

  • Paste entire files (2000+ tokens)
  • Repeat context in every prompt
  • Over-explain simple tasks
  • Get mediocre results, high costs

Better approach:

  • Precise, minimal prompts
  • Reuse context efficiently
  • Get better results for 40% fewer tokens

Rule #1: Be Specific, Not Verbose

❌ Inefficient (150 tokens):

I have this function that processes user data and I need you to look at it
and tell me if there are any issues or problems with it and also suggest
improvements that could make it better and more efficient. Here's the code:


[paste entire 100-line file]

✅ Efficient (25 tokens):

Review processUser() for bugs and performance issues:


[paste only the 15-line function]

Tokens saved: 83% Result: Same or better analysis

Rule #2: Use Code References, Not Full Code

❌ Inefficient: Paste 500 lines to ask about one function.

✅ Efficient:

In UserService.authenticate() (lines 42-58), why does
login fail for users with 2FA enabled?

AI can:

  • Read the specific function
  • Understand context from file structure
  • Give targeted answers

Tokens saved: 90%

❌ Inefficient (3 separate prompts, 600 tokens):

Prompt 1: "Fix the login bug"
Prompt 2: "Add error handling to login"
Prompt 3: "Write tests for login"

✅ Efficient (1 prompt, 250 tokens):

For login():
1. Fix 2FA bug (line 47)
2. Add error handling
3. Generate tests


Return: fixed code + tests

Tokens saved: 58%

Rule #4: Establish Context Once

Session 1:

Working on React e-commerce app. Node 20, TypeScript,
using Redux for state. Need help with checkout flow.

All future prompts in same session:

Add PayPal support to checkout

(No need to repeat “React e-commerce app, Node 20…” each time)

Tokens saved per follow-up: ~80 tokens

Rule #5: Use Structured Formats

❌ Inefficient:

Can you help me understand what's wrong with this code and
fix it? It's not working properly...


[code]

✅ Efficient:

Bug:
Error: "undefined user.id"
Line: 23


Expected: Load user profile
Actual: Crash


Code: [15 lines]

Why better:

  • Structured input = structured output
  • AI focuses on the problem
  • Faster, more accurate responses

Prompt Templates Library

Bug Fix Template (30 tokens avg)

Bug: [error message]
Line: [number]
Expected: [behavior]
Actual: [behavior]
Code: [relevant lines only]

Code Review Template (25 tokens avg)

Review [function name] for:
- Security
- Performance
- Edge cases


[function code only]

Refactor Template (20 tokens avg)

Refactor [function]:
Goal: [specific improvement]
Constraints: [if any]


[code]

Test Generation Template (15 tokens avg)

Generate tests for [function]:
[function signature only]


Cover: happy path + 3 edge cases

Real Comparison: Same Task

Inefficient Approach

Prompt (280 tokens):

I'm building a web application and I have this authentication system
that I'm working on. I need help improving it because it's not working
quite right and users are having issues logging in sometimes. Here's
the entire auth system code:


[paste 300 lines of AuthService, UserModel, middleware, routes]


Can you look at this and tell me what might be wrong and how to fix it?
Also any other improvements you'd suggest would be great. Thanks!

AI Response: Generic advice, misses the actual bug (race condition in line 47)

Efficient Approach

Prompt (45 tokens):

AuthService.login() fails intermittently for users with 2FA.


Error (line 47): "Cannot read property 'code' of undefined"


Async flow: login → verify2FA → createSession


[paste lines 42-58]

AI Response: Identifies exact race condition, provides fix

Result:

  • 84% fewer tokens
  • Better, more targeted response
  • Problem solved in one exchange vs. 3-4 back-and-forth

Token Savings Calculator

TaskInefficientEfficientSaved
Bug fix300 tokens50 tokens83%
Code review500 tokens80 tokens84%
Refactor400 tokens60 tokens85%
Tests200 tokens40 tokens80%

Daily developer (20 AI requests):

  • Inefficient: ~7,000 tokens/day
  • Efficient: ~2,800 tokens/day
  • Savings: 60% (~$50-100/month depending on model)

Quick Wins: Apply Today

1. Stop pasting full files Instead: Paste only the relevant function/section

2. Use line numbers Instead: “Fix the bug” → “Fix bug at line 47”

3. Batch requests Instead: 3 prompts → 1 prompt with 3 tasks

4. Establish context once First prompt: Full context Follow-ups: Assume context

5. Use templates Copy-paste structures save thinking time + tokens

Advanced: Multi-Turn Efficiency

Conversation 1 (Inefficient - 1200 tokens):

User: [paste code] What's wrong?
AI: Could be several things...
User: [paste code again] Try this angle...
AI: Ah, I see now...
User: [paste code again] So how do I fix it?
AI: Here's the fix...

Conversation 2 (Efficient - 400 tokens):

User: Error in login() line 47. Race condition?


Expected: 2FA code verified before session created
Actual: Session created, then 2FA check fails


[paste lines 45-52]


Fix: Use Promise.all or await both?

Tokens saved: 67% Time saved: 10 minutes

Checklist: Before Hitting Send

Before sending a prompt, ask:

  • □ Did I paste only what’s needed? (not entire file)
  • □ Did I specify exact location? (line numbers, function name)
  • □ Did I state expected vs actual? (not just “it’s broken”)
  • □ Did I batch related requests? (not 3 separate prompts)
  • □ Can I use a template? (structured format)

If all YES: Your prompt is token-efficient ✅

Next Steps

Today:

  • Bookmark the 4 templates above
  • Try “function + line number” approach on next bug

This Week:

  • Track tokens used before/after applying these rules
  • Measure savings

Related:

Start now: Take your last AI prompt, rewrite it using Rule #1 (Be Specific, Not Verbose). Compare token counts.